The article talks about a special event where some smart people who know a lot about AI, which is like a computer that can think and learn, talked about how AI will change the world in the future. They also shared ideas on what kinds of things we can invest in to make money from these changes. Read from source...

1. The article is titled in a sensationalized way, trying to appeal to fear and curiosity without providing any concrete evidence or insights into the future of AI.
2. The author does not disclose their background or expertise in the field of AI, making it unclear why they are qualified to write about such a complex topic.
3. The article focuses on a single webinar hosted by Benzinga as the sole source of information and authority on AI trends, which is a very narrow and limited perspective.
4. The author does not mention any potential conflicts of interest or sponsored content, which could raise questions about their credibility and motives for writing the article.
5. The article fails to critically analyze the statements made by the panelists, such as Jeremy Barnett and Dr. Alex Wissner-Gross, who are promoting their own AI company RAD AI. This creates a bias in favor of their business interests and may not reflect the whole picture of AI development.
6. The article does not provide any data or facts to support the claims made by the panelists or the author, such as the impact of AI on the job market, the ethical implications of AI, or the current state of AI research and innovation.
7. The article ends with a promotional pitch for the webinar, which seems to be more about generating revenue than informing or educating the readers about AI.
8. The tone of the article is overly positive and enthusiastic about AI, without acknowledging the potential risks, challenges, or limitations of AI technology and its applications.
9. The article does not invite any feedback, questions, or counterarguments from the readers, which could foster a more engaging and interactive discussion about AI.