Key points:
- The DEA, a government agency that fights against drugs, praised Nixon's drug policies on the first day of Black History Month.
- These policies were very harsh and unfair to black people, who were arrested more for drugs than white people, even though they used drugs at similar rates.
- This led to many problems like mass incarceration (putting a lot of people in jail) and the destruction of black communities.

Summary:
The DEA is an organization that tries to stop drug use in the country. They decided to celebrate the president who started the War on Drugs, Richard Nixon, but they did this on a day that honors black history. This was not nice because the War on Drugs hurt many black people and their communities more than others. The DEA's actions made some people angry because they think it is unfair to praise someone who caused so much harm. Read from source...

- The title is misleading and sensationalist. It implies that the DEA is somehow insulting black history month by promoting Nixon's drug war policies, which are not directly related to each other. A more accurate and neutral title would be something like "DEA Promotes Nixon's Drug War Policies On First Day Of Black History Month".
- The article relies heavily on the opinions of Ehrlichman, a former Nixon aide who was involved in the Watergate scandal and later pardoned by Reagan. His credibility is questionable and his motives may be biased or self-serving. A more balanced approach would be to include other perspectives from different sources, such as academic experts, current policy makers, or former drug users/dealers who lived through the era.
- The article uses emotional language and anecdotes to convey its message. For example, it quotes Ehrlichman saying "We knew we were lying about the drugs". This is a subjective statement that does not provide any evidence or facts to support it. It also appeals to the reader's emotions by suggesting that the War on Drugs was based on racism and discrimination, without acknowledging the complexity of the issue or presenting any data or statistics to back it up.
- The article assumes a causal relationship between Nixon's drug war policies and the current state of mass incarceration and racial disparities in the justice system. However, this is a oversimplification that ignores other factors that may have contributed to these problems, such as changes in social norms, economic conditions, law enforcement practices, or judicial decisions. A more nuanced analysis would be needed to determine the extent and impact of Nixon's policies on the present situation.
- The article ends with a blatant advertisement for a cannabis investment newsletter. This is irrelevant and inappropriate for the topic at hand, and may undermine the credibility and objectivity of the author and the publisher. A better way to conclude the article would be to provide some suggestions or recommendations for how to address the ongoing issues related to drug policy and social justice in the U.S.