A lawyer named Maslatón is upset because for a long time, people were told that marijuana, a plant some use to feel better or have fun, was very bad and illegal. But now, in the US, they are thinking about changing the rules and saying it's not as bad as they thought. This makes Maslatón happy, but also worried because he thinks people should be allowed to use marijuana without getting in trouble. He is telling Argentina's security leader that she should stop taking away marijuana from people who have it. Read from source...

1. The title is misleading and sensationalist, implying that there has been a conspiracy or deliberate deception about the effects of marijuana for 60 years, rather than acknowledging that scientific understanding and public opinion have evolved over time.
2. The article focuses on Argentina's president-elect Alberto Fernández and his cannabis use, as well as the pressure he faces to legalize marijuana in the country. This is irrelevant to the main topic of the DEA's potential reclassification of cannabis in the US.
3. The quote from Maslatón is taken out of context and presented as a recent statement, when it was actually from 2017. This undermines the credibility of the article and suggests a lack of research or care on the part of the author.
4. The article uses emotive language such as "lying" and "prohibited" to frame the issue as a moral crusade, rather than an evidence-based policy decision. This may appeal to some readers' biases, but it does not contribute to a balanced or informative discussion of the topic.
5. The article presents the DEA's potential reclassification as a surprising and relief to many, without providing any context or explanation for why this is the case. It also fails to mention any potential drawbacks or criticisms of the reclassification, which could be seen as a biased presentation of the issue.
6. The article ends with Maslatón's tweet, which suggests that he supports legalizing marijuana and allowing banks to handle its sales. However, this is not directly related to the main topic of the DEA's reclassification, and it may be seen as a weak or irrelevant conclusion.

DAN:

Neutral
Explanation: The article does not express a clear sentiment towards either the legalization or prohibition of marijuana. It mainly reports on the DEA's potential reclassification and its implications for Argentina's government and cannabis industry.