A man named Jim Cramer thinks that Apple will win a big argument with the US government about how they use their iPhones and other things. He says this is not a good reason to sell or stop buying Apple's stock, because he doesn't think the US government has enough proof to prove Apple did something wrong. He believes people should keep investing in Apple because it will do well. Read from source...

- The title is misleading and sensationalist, implying that Cramer remains bullish despite a strong antitrust case against Apple. In reality, the article does not present any evidence or analysis of the case, but only reports on Cramer's opinion. This creates a false impression of the situation and may influence readers to follow Cramer's advice without critical thinking.
- The article uses vague terms such as "smartphone monopoly" and "difficult and expensive" to describe Apple's alleged anti-competitive practices, without providing any quantitative or comparative data. This makes it easier for the author to assert their claim without being challenged by facts or logic.
- The article compares the current lawsuit with the Microsoft case from the late 90s and early 2000s, but fails to acknowledge the significant differences in the market conditions, consumer preferences, and technological innovations that have occurred since then. This is a classic example of false analogy and ignores the specific details and nuances of each case.
- The article quotes Cramer's opinion as if it were an authoritative or expert source, without disclosing his potential conflicts of interest or bias. Cramer is a financial commentator and investor who owns shares of Apple and has a vested interest in seeing the stock price rise. He may also have a professional or personal relationship with Apple's management or board members that could affect his judgment. This creates a conflict of interest and undermines the credibility of the article.
- The article ends with a dramatic statement from Cramer, urging readers not to sell their Apple shares and to buy more. This is an example of emotional appeals and manipulation, aimed at persuading readers to follow his advice without considering the rational arguments or evidence presented in the article. This also suggests that the author's primary goal is to generate clicks and traffic for their website, rather than inform or educate the audience.

Bullish

Summary of the article:
Jim Cramer remains an Apple bull despite the DOJ's antitrust case against the company. He believes that the DOJ lacks substantial proof to establish Apple's wrongdoing and views this lawsuit as another buying opportunity for the stock. The article also mentions a recent drop in Apple's shares due to the lawsuit but highlights Cramer's advice not to sell them.

1. Jim Cramer Remains An Apple Bull Despite DOJ's Antitrust Case: 'Brand Spanking New Reason To Buy'.