Meta Platforms, the company led by Mark Zuckerberg, is testing a new feature for its Quest headsets that works similar to Apple's Vision Pro. This feature allows users to place windows on different places and keep them there even if they move or take off the headset. This could help make Meta's devices more like Apple's spatial computing, which creates immersive virtual experiences. Zuckerberg thinks his own Quest 3 is better than Apple's Vision Pro, but he still wants to add similar features to his devices. He also visited South Korea to talk with LG Electronics about making a new headset together. Read from source...

1. The article title is misleading and sensationalized, as it implies that Meta Platforms is directly testing a feature similar to Apple Vision Pro for its Quest headsets, while the actual report only mentions that Meta is experimenting with some mixed reality features inspired by Apple's spatial computing vision. A more accurate title would be "Meta Platforms Explores Mixed Reality Features Inspired By Apple's Spatial Computing Vision".
2. The article uses vague and ambiguous terms such as "seem to work quite the same way" and "does not seem to work quite the same way", without providing any specific details or comparisons of how the features differ between Meta Quest and Apple Vision Pro. This creates confusion and uncertainty for the readers, who might be left wondering what exactly is being tested and why it matters.
3. The article quotes Zuckerberg's personal opinion on the value and quality of Meta Quest compared to Apple Vision Pro, without providing any objective evidence or data to support his claims. This creates a biased and one-sided perspective, as well as an appeal to authority fallacy, which is not helpful for informing the readers about the actual features and benefits of either product.
4. The article mentions Zuckerberg's reported trip to South Korea to discuss a potential partnership with LG Electronics Inc for a new XR headset, without explaining how this relates to the original report or what it means for Meta Platforms' strategy and future plans. This introduces an irrelevant and unrelated detail that might distract the readers from the main topic of the article, which is supposed to be about Meta Quest and Apple Vision Pro.
5. The article ends with a link to more Consumer Tech coverage by Benzinga, without any transition or conclusion. This leaves the reader hanging and unsatisfied, as they might feel that the article did not provide enough information or insight on the topic at hand, or that it was just a clickbait to attract attention to other articles.

Based on these story critics, I would rate this article as 1 out of 5 stars, as it fails to deliver a clear, accurate, and informative report on Meta Platforms' experiments with mixed reality features inspired by Apple's spatial computing vision. It also suffers from various flaws in terms of language, logic, tone, and structure, which make it hard to follow and trust. I would not recommend this article to anyone who is interested in learning more about Meta Quest or Apple Vision Pro, as it does not offer any valuable or useful information on either product.