This article talks about a very smart person who helps people decide which companies are good to invest in. He has been right many times before and thinks one company called Zscaler will do well. The article also tells us five other stocks that this smart person liked last week. Read from source...

1. The first sentence is misleading and inaccurate, as it implies that Wall Street analysts are always making new stock picks on a daily basis, which is not true. Some analysts may take breaks or only report weekly or monthly. The correct statement would be "Wall Street analysts make new stock picks regularly."
2. The second sentence acknowledges that analyst ratings and price targets can vary widely, but fails to provide any evidence or reasoning for why this is the case. A more informative statement would explain how different methods of analysis, such as fundamental vs technical, or quantitative vs qualitative, can lead to different conclusions about a stock's future performance.
3. The third sentence introduces Benzinga's Analyst Ratings API without any context or explanation of what it is, how it works, or why it is useful for investors. A better introduction would provide some background information on the source and credibility of the ratings, as well as a brief description of the features and benefits of the API.
4. The fourth sentence uses vague and subjective terms like "highest-quality" and "curated" without defining or justifying them. These words may imply that the ratings are based on some objective criteria or expert judgment, but they do not provide any concrete evidence or details to support this claim. A more transparent statement would specify how the quality of the ratings is measured or verified, and who is responsible for curating them.
5. The last sentence is irrelevant and out of place, as it does not relate to the topic of the article or the ratings API. It seems to be an advertisement for another Benzinga product, which may confuse or annoy readers who are looking for information about the Analyst Ratings API. A better way to end the article would be to summarize the main points and provide a clear call to action for interested users.