A man named Michael Ballanger wrote an article about gold and silver. He talked about how some people thought only gold was important but he believes both gold and silver are very important together because they make a good team. He also mentioned that in the past, some rich people tried to make the price of silver go up a lot, but the government and other powerful groups stopped them. Read from source...

1. The author begins with an anecdote about a client who corrected him on his investment ideas, which serves no purpose other than to establish his credibility and experience in the market. However, this does not add any value or insight to the main topic of the article.
2. The author's choice to use quotes around "asset of choice" implies that he is mocking or dismissing gold as an investment option, which reveals a bias against gold and potentially influences his analysis throughout the article.
3. The author argues that no bull market in gold can survive without silver, which is an irrational argument because it assumes a causal relationship between the two metals' performance without providing any evidence or reasoning to support this claim.
4. The author mentions playing silver early in his career but does not provide any specific details or examples of how he made money from investing in silver, which makes this statement seem like an empty boast rather than a valuable piece of information for readers.