A man named van Eck, who is the boss of a big company called VanEck, says that people should have some digital money called cryptos in their collections of things they own to make more money. He thinks these cryptos are very important and can change how we use money in the future. Another man named Pal, who knows a lot about how countries work and digital money, agrees with van Eck and says he has been studying digital money for a long time. They both think it is important to understand how digital money connects with big changes happening around the world. Read from source...

1. The title is misleading and sensationalized, as it implies that cryptos deserve a place in everyone's portfolio, regardless of their individual circumstances, preferences, or risk tolerance. This ignores the diversity and complexity of investors' goals and needs, and suggests a one-size-fits-all approach that is unrealistic and potentially harmful.
2. The article relies heavily on anecdotal evidence and personal opinions, rather than empirical data and objective analysis, to support its claim that cryptos are a valuable asset class. For example, the author quotes van Eck's journey into crypto, which may be informative and interesting, but does not provide any solid proof or reasoning for why cryptos should be part of everyone's portfolio.
3. The article also suffers from confirmation bias, as it only presents positive aspects of crypto, while ignoring the numerous challenges, risks, and drawbacks that investors may face when allocating to this asset class. For instance, the author does not mention any of the following issues: volatility, security, regulation, scalability, energy consumption, environmental impact, etc.
4. The article lacks a clear structure and coherence, as it jumps from one topic to another without providing any logical connection or transition. For example, the author switches from discussing van Eck's journey into crypto, to explaining the disruptive potential of blockchain and cryptocurrencies, to describing Pal's expertise in macroeconomics and crypto, without establishing how these points relate to each other or support the main argument.
5. The article is emotionally charged and biased, as it uses words and phrases that appeal to readers' feelings and beliefs, rather than their rationality and critical thinking. For example, the author uses terms like "disruptive", "revolutionary", "transformative", etc., which suggest that cryptos are a game-changer and a must-have for any investor, without providing any evidence or analysis to back up these claims. The author also uses rhetorical questions, such as "don't you want to be part of the future?", which imply that anyone who does not invest in cryptos is missing out on a great opportunity and is behind the times.

Positive

This article presents a positive sentiment towards cryptocurrencies and their potential role in investors' portfolios. The VanEck CEO expresses his belief that crypto deserves a place in everyone's portfolio, while also discussing the importance of understanding the disruptive potential of blockchain and cryptocurrencies from a macro perspective. Additionally, Pal, an expert in macroeconomics and crypto, shares his journey of cracking the code of crypto within the business cycle and emphasizes the significance of comprehending the intersection of crypto and macro investing. Overall, the article conveys optimism and support for cryptocurrencies as a valuable asset class for investors.