Cathie Wood is a person who invests money in different companies. She thinks that soon, there will be more than just two big companies making smartphones. She says new devices, like glasses from Meta and others, will change how we use phones and make new companies popular. Read from source...

1. The article title is misleading and sensationalized, implying that a new smartphone duopoly will replace the current one of Apple Inc. (NASDAQ: AAPL) and Alphabet Inc. (NASDAQ: GOOG) (NASDAQ: GOOGL). However, the article does not provide any evidence or data to support this claim.
2. The article focuses on Meta Platforms' impressive Q4 results and projects a 25% revenue growth for the current quarter, but fails to mention that the company is facing several challenges and controversies, such as the whistleblower allegations, antitrust lawsuits, and criticism over its metaverse vision.
3. The article also ignores the potential competition from other existing or emerging players in the smartphone market, such as Samsung Electronics Co Ltd (OTC: SMLEF), Huawei Technologies Co Ltd, Xiaomi Corp (XIACF), and Oppo Group. These companies have a strong presence in Asia and other regions, and are constantly innovating to offer new features and capabilities to their customers.
4. The article claims that smart glasses and generative AI will be the next consumer trends, but does not provide any credible sources or research to back up this assertion. Moreover, the article fails to address the ethical, social, and technical challenges associated with these technologies, such as privacy concerns, human-computer interaction issues, and computational limitations.
5. The article ends with a vague statement that "others vie for post-phone supremacy", but does not specify who are these "others" or what are their strategies and visions for the future of mobile computing. This leaves the reader with an incomplete and unsatisfactory impression of the current and future landscape of the smartphone industry.

Overall, the article is a poorly written and unsubstantiated piece of journalism that relies on hype and speculation rather than facts and logic. It fails to provide any valuable insights or analysis for the readers who are interested in understanding the dynamics and trends of the smartphone market. The article also exhibits a clear bias towards Meta Platforms and its products, without acknowledging their flaws and risks.