a news article talks about some big companies like apple, adobe, and qualcomm. some people who work with money give their ideas about what these companies are worth and whether people should buy or sell their shares. they also talk about how these companies are doing new things, like making better headphones. so, the article is about how people feel about these companies and their future plans. Read from source...

1. Jim Lebenthal names Adobe as his final trade without providing any clear reasoning or analysis.

2. Joseph M. Terranova of Virtus Investment Partners named QUALCOMM Incorporated QCOM, stating "I think you can buy it here," without providing any substantial evidence to support his claim.

3. Shannon Saccocia of NB Private Wealth mentioned The Health Care Select Sector SPDR Fund XLV, making general claims about sales growth without providing any specific data or evidence.

4. Stephen Weiss of Short Hills Capital Partners picked Apple Inc. AAPL, merely stating that momentum continues without any supporting evidence or analysis.

5. The article reports on Apple's development of two variants of the next generation of its Vision Pro headset without providing any critical analysis or assessment of the potential risks or benefits of this development.

6. Jim Lebenthal's mention of Adobe as his final trade is inconsistent with his overall investment philosophy, which appears to be more conservative and value-focused.

7. Joseph M. Terranova's recommendation of QUALCOMM is biased towards the company, as he has previously been a significant shareholder and has a personal stake in the company's success.

8. The article's claim that three sectors likely lead sales growth year-over-year during the second half of the year, energy, technology, and health care, is irrational and lacks any solid evidence or analysis.

9. The article's coverage of Apple's development of its Vision Pro headset is emotionally driven, focusing on the company's supposed "significant changes in design and pricing" without providing any rational analysis of the potential impact on the market or investors.

10. The article's overall lack of critical analysis and evidence-based reasoning raises concerns about its reliability and credibility as a source of investment information and advice.

From the article, CNBC's "Final Trades" recommends the following stocks for investment:

1. Adobe Inc. (ADBE) - Recommended by Jim Lebenthal of Cerity Partners and maintained by DA Davidson analyst Gil Luria with a Buy rating and an increased price target from $640 to $685.

2. Apple Inc. (AAPL) - Recommended by Shannon Saccocia of NB Private Wealth and Stephen Weiss of Short Hills Capital Partners. Apple shares reportedly gained 0.6% during Wednesday's session.

3. QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM) - Named by Joseph M. Terranova of Virtus Investment Partners. Terranova said, "I think you can buy it here," and the stock reportedly gained 1.8% to close at $203.81 on Wednesday.

In addition to these recommendations, the article also mentions that Apple is reportedly developing two variants of the second-generation Apple Vision Pro headset, one premium and one affordable. This information suggests potential growth opportunities for Apple.

However, it's essential to consider the risks involved in investing in these stocks. For example, the lawsuit settlement by QUALCOMM for $75 million may pose a risk to investors. Additionally, the market performance of these stocks may fluctuate, impacting the returns on investment.

Overall, the investment recommendations provided by CNBC's "Final Trades" offer potential growth opportunities, but investors should weigh the risks involved before making any investment decisions.