Okay, so there is this thing called CNBC and they have a show where people talk about stocks and what they think will happen with them. They call it "Final Trades". In this article, some experts are talking about different companies and what they think about their future. Some of these companies are Apollo Global Management, Blackstone, Schlumberger Limited and Alibaba Group Holding.

Some people who watch these stocks have different opinions on them. For example, one person thinks that Apollo Global Management is doing really well and will keep going up in price. Another person likes a company called Schlumberger Limited because they did very good work recently. They all share their ideas about which stocks are the best to buy or sell right now. Read from source...

- The article lacks clarity and coherence in presenting the information about the Final Trades segment on CNBC. It jumps from one topic to another without providing a clear structure or context for the readers.
- The article mixes different types of sources, such as analysts, experts, insiders, and quotes, without clearly distinguishing them or explaining their relevance or credibility. This creates confusion and ambiguity for the readers who might not know how to evaluate the information presented.
- The article uses vague and subjective terms, such as "breaking out", "phenomenal quarter", "heavyweight", etc., without providing any evidence or data to support them. These terms might appeal to emotions or biases, but they do not inform the readers about the actual performance or prospects of the companies mentioned in the article.
- The article does not provide any analysis or insight into the factors that drive the market trends or the investment decisions of the Final Trades participants. It simply reports their opinions and ratings without contextualizing them within the broader market conditions or expectations. This leaves the readers without a clear understanding of why they should care about the article topic or the companies involved.
- The article ends abruptly with an incomplete sentence, which suggests a lack of professionalism and attention to detail from the author. It also creates frustration for the readers who might want to know more about the companies mentioned in the article or the Final Trades segment on CNBC.

Neutral

Key points:
- The article discusses the Final Trades segment of CNBC, where various analysts and experts share their investment ideas.
- Benzinga is the source of the article and provides news and insights on stocks, cryptocurrencies, forex, and other assets.
- The article covers four companies: Apollo Global Management, Blackstone, Alibaba Group Holding, and Schlumberger Limited. For each company, the article mentions an analyst's rating, price target, earnings estimate, and recent performance.
- The tone of the article is informative and factual, without expressing a clear bias or opinion on the companies or their prospects.

I have analyzed the article you provided and generated the following comprehensive investment recommendations and risks based on the information given by CNBC's "Final Trades" panelists. Please note that these are only suggestions and not guarantees of performance or returns, and you should always do your own research and consult a professional financial advisor before making any investment decisions. ### Final trades for Jan. 25, 2024: