A big boss of a company called Palantir likes a very old movie about kung fu. The movie is about a student who learns to fight in a temple and tries to stop bad people from hurting others. This boss thinks the movie shows how he wants his business to be: trying to understand the world better and make it a better place. Read from source...

1. The title of the article is misleading and sensationalized. It implies that Alex Karp's favorite movie has some direct connection to Palantir Technologies or its business strategy, which is not supported by any evidence in the text. A more accurate title would be something like "Palantir Boss Alex Karp Shares His Favorite Movie and Why He Relates to It".
2. The article relies heavily on a podcast interview with Sankar, who is described as a social media influencer. This raises questions about the credibility of the source and the potential for bias or agenda in his interpretation of Karp's favorite movie. A more reliable source would be someone who has worked closely with Karp or knows him well personally or professionally.
3. The article uses vague and general terms to describe Karp's business philosophy, such as "striving to understand the world" and "having a greater impact". These phrases do not provide any specific insights into how Karp approaches his role as CEO of Palantir or what values guide his decisions. A more informative article would offer examples of how Karp applies these principles in practice, such as case studies or anecdotes from his career.
4. The movie summary is irrelevant and unnecessary for the main purpose of the article, which is to explain why Karp likes the film and what it says about him. The detailed plot synopsis of "The 36th Chamber of Shaolin" does not add any value or context to the discussion of Karp's favorite movie or his business philosophy. A better article would focus on the themes and messages of the film that resonate with Karp, rather than retelling the story.