Alright buddy, imagine you have a super secret message that you only want your best friend to read. You don't want anyone else to understand it, right? So, you make up special words and rules just for the two of you. This way, when you write down the secret message using these special words and rules, only your best friend can figure out what it says!

Now, quantum computers are like having a super genius best friend who's really, really good at solving those special word puzzles super fast! But here's the thing: these special puzzles are actually super hard for regular computers to solve. They can't figure them out as quickly or easily as your super genius best friend (the quantum computer) can.

So, when we use special math problems to keep our secret messages safe (like they do with something called cryptography), quantum computers might be able to read those secrets faster than regular computers. But don't worry! Scientists and experts are working on making new secret codes that even these super smart computers won't be able to crack as easily. It's like them creating new, even harder puzzles for your best friend to solve!

In simple terms, quantum computing is just a way of doing really tough math problems much faster than regular computers can! Read from source...

Based on the provided text, here are some points that could be critiqued from a storytelling perspective:

1. **Lack of Clear Narrative Structure**: The text starts with a headline and then jumps into the news without introducing any narrative arc or clear beginning, middle, and end. This makes it feel more like an informational piece rather than a well-structured story.

2. **Info-Dump**: There's a lot of information provided about IBM and its collaboration with Telefónica and Microsoft, but it's not presented in a way that builds suspense or engages the reader. It comes across as an info-dump rather than a narrative flow.

3. **Lack of Context and Depth**: While the text mentions that quantum computing is "seen as the next big thing," there's no context provided about why this is important, who stands to benefit, and how it might impact society at large. This makes the story less engaging and more like a dry, factual report.

4. **Lack of Human Interest**: The story focuses on big corporations (IBM, Telefónica, Microsoft) but doesn't mention any individuals involved in this project. Including human stories can make even complex technologies feel more relatable and compelling.

5. **Passive Voice and Technical Language**: The text is written mostly in passive voice ("Quantum computing is seen...", "The platform was built..."), which can make it feel less engaging. Also, the use of technical language like "Quantencomputer" might confuse some readers.

6. **Lack of Quotes or Expert Insights**: Incorporating quotes from experts in the field could add a layer of credibility and depth to the story. It would also provide insights that go beyond just regurgitating facts.

Here's how the story might improve with these changes:

- Introduce a narrative arc with a clear beginning, middle, and end.
- Use storytelling techniques like suspense, contrast, or humor to engage readers.
- Provide context for why quantum computing is important and who stands to gain from it.
- Incorporate human stories to make the story more relatable.
- Use active voice and avoid excessive technical jargon.
- Include quotes or insights from experts in the field.

Of course, these critiques depend on the intended target audience and purpose of the story. A purely informative piece might be best served without these changes.

Based on the provided text, here's a sentiment analysis:

1. **IBM (International Business Machines Corp)**:
- Bullish: " IBM stock rose on Tuesday "
- Positive: " The company reported earnings that beat expectations "

2. **Quantum Computing**:
- Neutral to Positive: The article discusses partnerships and advancements in quantum computing, with no significant negative sentiment.

3. **General Sentiment**:
- Overall, the sentiment of the article is positive, highlighting IBM's stock rise, earnings beat, and advancements in quantum computing.

So, the overall sentiment of the article can be described as **positive**.