Key points:

1. Spanish Startup Association complains about Microsoft's cloud practices in Spain.
2. They say Microsoft uses its power in other areas to force startups to use Azure cloud.
3. They want the competition watchdog to investigate and make things fair for everyone.
4. This is not the first time Microsoft faces problems with its cloud business in Europe.
5. New EU law tries to stop anti-competitive practices like this.

Summary:

A group of Spanish startups is unhappy with how Microsoft treats them in the cloud business. They think Microsoft uses its power in other areas, like computers and software, to make startups use their Azure cloud service. This gives startups less choice and freedom. The startup group wants the competition watchdog in Spain to look into this and fix it. This is not a one-time issue for Microsoft, as they also face complaints from other European groups. A new EU law aims to stop companies like Microsoft from doing these unfair things. Read from source...

1. The headline is misleading as it implies that Microsoft faces scrutiny solely due to the complaint filed by a Spanish startup association. In reality, Microsoft has been facing multiple investigations and complaints from various sources regarding its cloud practices in Europe.
2. The article omits important details about the CISPE complaint and the ongoing EU and U.K. investigations, which provide context to the overall situation and show that this is not an isolated incident but part of a broader trend of challenges for Microsoft's cloud business in Europe.
3. The article presents the Spanish Startup Association as a neutral and objective source, without mentioning its vested interests or potential conflicts of interest. For example, the association may benefit from promoting more competition in the cloud market, which could result in increased demand for startup services that rely on cloud infrastructure.
4. The article quotes Carlos Mateo, president of the Spanish Startup Association, who uses emotional language such as "equality" and "not being left behind", which appeal to readers' feelings rather than presenting a rational and factual analysis of the situation. Additionally, his statement is vague and does not specify how exactly Microsoft's practices harm startups or what specific measures he proposes to ensure fair competition.
5. The article does not provide any counterarguments or balanced perspectives from other stakeholders, such as Microsoft itself or its customers who may benefit from its cloud services. This creates a one-sided and biased narrative that favors the Spanish Startup Association's point of view over others.
6. The article ends with an unrelated and irrelevant mention of Tesla investor Ross Gerber's opinion on Warren Buffett, which has no connection to the main topic of the article and seems to be inserted as a filler or clickbait tactic.