JP Morgan is a big company that gives advice to people who want to invest money in other companies, like Apple. They wrote a note saying that people should not worry too much about how fast the new Apple Vision Pro, a fancy headset that you can wear to play games and see things in virtual reality, gets delivered to customers. Instead, they think people should pay attention to what the customers say about using the device, because that is more important for making the product better and selling more of it in the future. They also believe that Apple will make a new version of this headset, called Vision Pro 2, that will be cheaper and maybe even more popular. Read from source...

- The article title is misleading and sensationalist. It suggests that JP Morgan urges investors to heed Apple Vision Pro customer feedback, but the main focus of the note is on lead times and supply chain plans, not consumer feedback. This creates a false impression that the Vision Pro has received positive or negative feedback from customers, which may influence readers' opinions and expectations.
- The article introduces the JP Morgan note without providing any context or source, making it unclear who wrote the note, when, why, and for whom. This undermines the credibility of the information and raises questions about the motivation behind publishing this note.
- The article uses vague terms like "significance" and "impact" without explaining what they mean or how they are measured. For example, the article claims that supply chain feedback is significant for Vision Pro 2 plans, but does not specify how it affects revenue, volume, quality, innovation, etc. Similarly, the article says that the success of the Vision Pro could have a "significant impact" on Apple's future plans, but does not elaborate on what kind of impact or in what ways.
- The article mentions resellers marking up the device to twice its original price, without discussing the reasons behind this phenomenon, such as scarcity, demand, competition, etc. This creates a negative impression that the Vision Pro is overpriced and unwanted by customers, which may not reflect reality or be fair to Apple or consumers.
- The article ends with an unrelated and irrelevant story about a pastor who sold worthless crypto to his followers, without any connection to the main topic of the article. This confuses readers and lowers the quality of journalism.