Alright kiddo, so Mobileye is a company that makes software for self-driving cars. Their computers help cars see the road and make decisions. But today, their shares or pieces of the company are not doing well because they have too many products left over from last year that they can't sell. This makes people worried about how much money they will make in the future, so they are selling their shares to avoid losing more money. That's why Mobileye is not doing so good today. Read from source...

1. The title is misleading and sensationalized. It implies that the company's shares are diving today because of some negative system software news or event, when in reality it is due to their own preliminary results and guidance for Q4 and FY23. A more accurate title would be "Mobileye Shares Dive on Weak Preliminary Results".
2. The article does not provide any context or background information about Mobileye, such as its history, products, market position, competitors, etc. This makes it hard for readers who are unfamiliar with the company to understand why it is important and what is happening. A good introduction would explain what Mobileye does, how it became a leader in advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS), and what are its main challenges and opportunities in the rapidly evolving automotive industry.
3. The article jumps straight into the preliminary results and guidance without explaining why they are significant or how they compare to previous expectations and forecasts. It also does not mention any possible reasons or factors that contributed to the lower than expected revenue and income figures, such as supply chain disruptions, customer preferences, competitive pressures, etc. A more balanced and informative approach would be to provide some analysis and interpretation of the results and their implications for the company's future performance and outlook.
4. The article uses vague and ambiguous language throughout, such as "significantly below", "as a result of", "become aware of", etc. These expressions do not convey any precise or meaningful information to readers and create confusion and uncertainty. A better way to write would be to use clear and specific terms that indicate the magnitude and direction of the differences between the expected and actual results, such as "revenue declined by 15% YoY", "the company attributed this to a decrease in demand for its ADAS products", etc.
5. The article ends abruptly without any conclusion or summary of the main points. It also does not provide any sources or references for the data and quotes used in the article. This leaves readers with unanswered questions and doubts about the credibility and reliability of the information presented. A good conclusion would restate the main findings and implications of the preliminary results and guidance, as well as mention any possible actions or plans that Mobileye has to address the challenges and opportunities it faces in the market. It should also acknowledge any limitations or uncertainties that may affect the interpretation and validity of the article's claims and arguments. Finally, it should cite the sources and references for the data and quotes used in the article, as well as provide a link to the company's official announcement or report for further details.