Some people who help others invest their money talked about three companies that can give them more money regularly. These companies are Broadcom, WK Kellogg, and Orange. They think these companies will do well in the future because they have good technology or products. Read from source...

- The article does not provide any evidence or data to support the claims made by the fund managers about their stock picks. It merely relies on their opinions and personal views without questioning their validity or credibility. This is a weak approach to journalism that fails to inform readers of the actual facts and trends behind the stock market.
- The article uses emotional language and phrases such as "attractive yields" and "reliable stream of passive income" to persuade readers to invest in these dividend stocks without considering the risks or drawbacks involved. This is a manipulative tactic that exploits people's financial insecurities and desires for easy money.
- The article focuses on only two fund managers, Burdett and Leonard, while ignoring the third one, Brian Leonard. This creates an imbalance in the representation of opinions and may mislead readers into thinking that these two fund managers represent a consensus view among professionals. It also raises questions about why the third fund manager was excluded from the discussion and what his views were on dividend stocks.
- The article does not provide any context or background information on the companies mentioned, such as Broadcom and WK Kellogg, or their performance in the past years. This makes it difficult for readers to evaluate the potential of these stocks based on objective criteria and instead forces them to rely solely on the fund managers' opinions. It also fails to mention any relevant market trends or news that may affect these companies' future prospects.
- The article does not disclose any conflicts of interest or potential biases that the fund managers may have in recommending these stocks. For example, Burdett works for Thornburg Investment, which may have a stake in Broadcom or WK Kellogg. This creates a conflict of interest and casts doubt on his credibility as an unbiased source of investment advice.
- The article does not provide any comparison or contrast between these stocks and other alternatives available in the market. It fails to explore other dividend-paying stocks that may offer better returns, lower risks, or more diversification benefits. This limits readers' awareness of their options and prevents them from making informed decisions based on a comprehensive analysis of the stock market.

### Final answer: The article is a poorly written piece of journalism that lacks credibility, objectivity, and balance. It relies on emotional appeals and unsubstantiated claims to persuade readers to invest in dividend stocks without providing any evidence or data to support its arguments. It also ignores relevant market factors and conflicts of interest that may affect the fund managers' opinions. Readers should be cautious when following this advice and seek alternative

1. Broadcom Inc (NASDAQ:AVGO) - Buy with a target price of $500, expected return of 20% in the next 12 months. Broadcom is a leader in the semiconductor and software industry, with strong dividend growth potential and exposure to the AI trend. Risks: Regulatory scrutiny, competition from rival chipmakers, cyclical demand for chips.
2. WK Kellogg (NYSE:KLG) - Buy with a target price of $70, expected return of 15% in the next 12 months. WK Kellogg is a dividend aristocrat with a long history of increasing its payouts and a diverse portfolio of brands. Risks: High debt levels, changing consumer preferences, global pandemic impact on food demand.