Whales are big investors who buy and sell lots of stocks. They are looking at a company called ServiceNow. Some whales think the price will go up, others think it will go down. They use something called options to make bets on this. Options are like special tickets that let you buy or sell a stock at a certain price in the future. Whales are using different prices for their bets, between $300 and $1,040 per share. Some whales bought more than 5,000 of these special tickets. We can see how many people are trading and how interested they are by looking at the volume and open interest numbers. Read from source...

- The title is misleading and sensationalist. It implies that whales are betting on ServiceNow as a whole, but the article only covers puts and calls trading. Whales could be betting on other assets or scenarios as well.
- The article does not provide any clear definition of what constitutes a "whale" in this context. Is it based on the number of contracts, the value of the trades, or some other criteria? This makes it hard to compare and contrast different traders' strategies and expectations.
- The article uses vague terms like "bullish" and "bearish" without explaining how they are measured or calculated. What is the basis for these classifications? How do they relate to the price action of ServiceNow's stock and options?
- The article relies on outdated data (the last 3 months) to determine the price range that whales have been targeting. This could be misleading, as the market conditions and sentiment may have changed significantly since then. A more relevant time frame would be the last few weeks or days.
- The article does not provide any context for the options trades, such as why they are occurring, what factors are influencing them, or how they relate to the overall performance of ServiceNow. It simply reports the numbers without any analysis or interpretation.
- The article fails to mention any potential conflicts of interest, biases, or agendas that may be behind the options trades. For example, are the whales insiders, short sellers, long term investors, or traders? What is their motivation for betting on ServiceNow? How does this affect their credibility and reliability as sources of information?
- The article lacks any personal story or anecdote from the author. It does not share any insights, experiences, opinions, or emotions that would make it more engaging, relatable, or persuasive for the reader. It is a dry and factual report that does not evoke any interest or emotion in the audience.
- The article could benefit from adding some charts, graphs, or images to illustrate the data and trends. This would make it more visually appealing, easier to understand, and more convincing for the reader. It would also help to highlight the main points and patterns that emerge from the options activity.
- The article could use some feedback or suggestions from experts, professionals, or other stakeholders in the ServiceNow ecosystem. This would add credibility, authority, and diversity of perspectives to the article. It would also provide some contrast and balance to the opinions and arguments presented in the article.

There are several factors to consider when making an investment decision, such as the company's financials, growth prospects, valuation, market sentiment, industry trends, etc. In the case of ServiceNow, some of the key points are:

- The company is a leader in the cloud-based software solutions market, with a strong brand reputation and loyal customer base. It has been consistently delivering revenue growth, operating margin expansion, and free cash flow generation, reflecting its business momentum and efficiency.