Okay, so there's this big company called Intel that makes tiny computer brains called microprocessors. These little brainies help computers and data centers work fast and smart. Intel is really good at what it does, but it also wants to try new things in other areas like cars and the Internet of Things. Now, some people who have lots of money are thinking about whether they should buy or sell parts of Intel called options. These options let them make bets on how well Intel will do in the future. We're going to look at what these big money people are thinking and maybe learn something useful from them. Read from source...

1. The title is misleading and clickbaity, implying that the big money is thinking about Intel as a whole, when in reality it only focuses on the options trading activity of the company's shareholders and investors. This creates a false impression that the article is about something more significant than it actually is.
2. The article does not provide any evidence or sources to support its claims about what the big money is thinking, relying instead on vague and unsubstantiated statements such as "noteworthy options activity" and "analyst color". This makes the article seem unprofessional and unreliable, lacking credibility and authority.
3. The article does not mention any of the recent challenges or controversies that Intel is facing, such as the meltdown and spectre vulnerabilities, the loss of market share to competitors like AMD, or the legal battles with rival firms. These are relevant factors that influence the opinions and decisions of the big money, but are ignored by the article.
4. The article does not explain how the options trading data is collected, analyzed, or interpreted, leaving readers in the dark about the methodology and validity of the results. This makes it impossible to verify or replicate the findings, casting doubt on their accuracy and usefulness.
5. The article does not provide any context or background information about Intel's business model, products, services, or strategy, making it difficult for readers to understand the relevance and significance of the options trading data. This creates a gap in the reader's knowledge and awareness, limiting their ability to make informed decisions based on the article.
6. The article does not address any of the potential risks or drawbacks associated with investing in Intel, such as market volatility, competition, regulation, or innovation. This makes the article seem one-sided and incomplete, neglecting to consider the possibility that the big money might be thinking otherwise about Intel's future prospects.