**Title: "Can AI Voices Take Over Simpsons Characters?"**

* A famous voice actor, Hank Azaria, who makes many funny voices on "The Simpsons," tried an experiment with computers.
* He recorded some of his famous characters' voices, and then computers tried to copy them using something called "AI" (short for Artificial Intelligence).
* The computers did try, but they didn't do a very good job. Hank said their Moe the Bartender voice was missing some important sounds.
* This might be because making funny voices is like doing a special kind of AIce with your mouth and body - not so easy for computers to copy!
* Hank thinks that while AI is getting better, it's still not ready to replace real people who can act and make fun sounds.
* So don't worry, kids! Your favorite "Simpsons" voices are safe from the computers... at least for now. Read from source...

**AI's Criticisms:**

1. **Lack of Balance:** The article heavily focuses on Hank Azaria's skepticism towards AI replacing human voice actors, but it doesn't explore the counterview from those who believe in AI's potential. It would be more balanced to present both sides of the argument.

2. **Vague Futurism:** Statements like "AI is improving" are used without providing concrete examples or statistics. To make a compelling case about AI's capabilities, specific instances should be mentioned.

3. **Audience-Dictated Future Assumption:** The statement "If it [AI-generated voice] does start to cut it, people are going to listen to it" implies that audience preferences will determine the use of AI in entertainment. This is a simplification; regulation, privacy concerns, and creator rights also play significant roles.

4. **Fear-Mongering:** There's a hint of fear-mongering in how Azaria presents AI as an existential threat to human voice actors. While it might change the industry, it doesn't necessarily mean the end for human voice actors. Their skills can evolve and adapt to new technologies.

5. **Ethical Issues:** The article briefly mentions controversy around using AI to clone voices without permission but could delve deeper into ethical issues surrounding AI-generated voices, such as consent, privacy, and misinformation.

6. **Lack of Industry Viewpoints:** Besides Azaria, who is primarily a voice actor, the article lacks perspectives from other industry professionals – producers, directors, or fellow actors – who might have different views on the role of AI in their line of work.

7. **Misleading Headline:** The headline "Is This The End Of Human Voice Actors?" could be seen as sensationalized and fear-mongering, given that it's highly unlikely human voice actors will become entirely obsolete in the near future.

The article "Will The Simpsons Be Voiced By AI One Day? Hank Azaria Checks To See If His Job Is Safe" carries a **negative to neutral sentiment**. Here's why:

1. **Negative aspects:**
- AI struggles to replicate iconic voices and acting styles accurately.
- Questions of consent arise when AI mimics celebrities' voices without permission.

2. **Neutral aspects:**
- The article presents both challenges and potential future acceptance of AI in voice acting.
- There's no definitive conclusion or strong opinion stating that AI will or won't replace human actors.

While the tone is cautiously optimistic about AI's development, it also acknowledges significant hurdles and concerns. Therefore, the overall sentiment can be considered negative to neutral.