Two important people talked about big companies that make phones and computers. They said these two companies are not very good at making smart machines that can think and learn. But one of them thinks they will get better soon. The other person agreed with him. Read from source...

- The article title is misleading and sensationalized. It implies that Apple and Alphabet are AI underdogs, when in reality they are the dominant players in the AI market with billions of dollars in revenue and R&D spending.
- The article quotes Gene Munster and AI Nathan, who are not credible sources on AI. Munster is a former stock analyst turned venture capitalist, who has made numerous incorrect predictions about technology trends and companies. Nathan is a financial analyst and podcaster, who often uses hyperbolic language and makes subjective claims without evidence.
- The article focuses too much on the rumored partnership between Apple and Nvidia, which is not confirmed and may not even happen. It also ignores the fact that Apple has been investing heavily in its own AI chips, such as the Neural Engine and M1 chip, which are already powering its devices and software features.
- The article compares Jensen Wang, the CEO of Nvidia, to Apple's lack of excitement around its products. This is a false comparison, as Nvidia is a niche player in the AI market, while Apple is one of the largest consumer electronics companies in the world. Apple has a loyal fan base and sells millions of devices every quarter, which generates significant revenue and profits for the company.
- The article ends with Nathan's speculation about the future of AI, which is vague and unsubstantiated. He claims that we will look back on this period as a turning point in AI history, but he does not provide any evidence or reasoning to support this claim. He also uses emotional language, such as "amazing" and "adoring fans", to appeal to the reader's feelings rather than logic.

DAN: Final thoughts
--------------------

The article is a poor attempt at journalism, which tries to create controversy and generate clicks by presenting unsupported opinions as facts. It also demonstrates a lack of understanding of the AI market and the competitive landscape. The author should be ashamed of writing such a low-quality piece of content.

Positive
Analysis: The article discusses how Apple Inc. and Alphabet Inc. are considered AI underdogs by Gene Munster and AI Nathan. They also mention the potential partnership between Apple and Nvidia Corporation. The overall tone of the article is optimistic about these companies' future in AI, as they believe their status as underdogs will change.