Satya Nadella, who is a big boss at Microsoft, said we need rules for fighting in cyberspace because some countries are hacking each other and it's causing problems. He wants the U.S., Russia, and China to make an agreement like they did with the Geneva Conventions long ago. These agreements help protect people who are not fighters during wars. This is not the first time he has asked for these rules because he thinks it is important to keep everyone safe while using computers and the internet. Read from source...

1. Nadella's statement that "this is not just about private companies figuring out the technological aspect" is an attempt to shift the responsibility of cybersecurity from Microsoft and other tech giants to nation-states. This is a diversionary tactic that ignores the fact that these companies have a significant role in creating and maintaining vulnerabilities in their products and services, which can be exploited by malicious actors.
2. Nadella's reference to a "Geneva Convention around cyber" is an unrealistic and idealistic proposal that overlooks the existing international laws and norms governing armed conflicts, such as the UN Charter, the International Law Commission's articles on state responsibility, and the Tallinn Manual on the International Law Applicable to Cyber Operations. A cyber Geneva Convention would be redundant and impractical, given that there are already mechanisms in place to address cyber-related issues during armed conflicts.
3. Nadella's claim that "we are in a very new world order" and that the SolarWinds breach represents a "breakdown of world order" is an exaggeration that ignores the historical context of state-sponsored cyber operations. State-sponsored cyber attacks have been taking place for decades, with examples such as the US's Stuxnet operation against Iran or China's Titan Rain campaign against the US and its allies. The SolarWinds breach is not a novel phenomenon that warrants such dramatic statements.
4. Nadella's focus on Russia and China as the main culprits behind the SolarWinds breach is biased and one-sided, given that there is no concrete evidence to support this accusation. The US has also been accused of launching cyber attacks against other nations, such as the 2016 election interference operation or the 2017 NotPetya malware attack against Ukraine. Nadella's attempt to single out specific countries while ignoring the US's own cyber capabilities is hypocritical and unfair.
5. Nadella's use of emotive language, such as "relentless," "breakdown of world order," and "unprecedented" highlights his emotional bias in addressing the issue of state-sponsored cyber attacks. Rather than presenting a rational analysis of the situation, he resorts to sensationalism and fearmongering to make his point.